Recently, I was teaching Marge Piercy’s article
“Why I Want a Wife”. It was a mixed classroom with boys sitting to my left in a
row and girls to my right.
There came a point where everything seemed
too drowsy. I did not even know what went wrong. Although I was explaining the
author’s ideas on how women were ‘treated’ after marriage by their partners,
something was missing from the class. I have always felt that acting on
immediate spur during a particularly monotonous and routine process, could
rejuvenate the situation. It is as if a stream of creative energy flows into my
being and I share it with everyone else surrounding me.
At the spur of the moment, I decided to ask
three questions.
1.
What is marriage?
2.
Which form of marriage do you prefer?
3.
Which is the marriageable age in your opinion, for both boys and
girls?
Two questions were answered immediately—the
first and third one. I was surprised at the response to the second question: most
of them were silent. This, I received from students, who normally would begin a
conundrum of talking once the topic of love or marriage is brought up. As I was
wondering what the reason for their silence was, one of the boys stood up.
“Sir, how can we be sure, what we share in this discussion wouldn’t go outside
of our class?” He asked.
This question stands as the naked proof for
how complicated the question of marriage is, with all its ramifications and existential
dilemma.
Indian culture still holds on to the Bollywood version of marriages, even in the twenty first century. Every
positive ending of a man-woman romance (no homosexuality here please) should
culminate in marriage, in order to be called successful and happy, with only
one difference from Hollywood—permission from parents.
Every movie, ever since movies are made in
India, has shown love as a central idea in their narratives. However, the love
between a man and woman found its glory only when it is approved and accepted
by the family of the bride and groom. Marriage has always been a matter of
parents; other members of the family and bride and groom only appear as the superfluous
outer cause for such a ceremony to take place. In other words, marriages
essentially become the coming together of two families.
I have heard the same saying many times in
my society, ‘love should happen after
marriage’. A risk-fearing mentality is clearly on the forefront when such a
statement is made. Romanticized and sensationalized love-failures are not
lacking in the Indian popular culture—including a story transported through its
myths, of Lord Krishna and Radha, whom Krishna abandons as he moves to a big
city, leaving his village.
Bollywood has its share too. In the 1955 Bollywood movie Devdas, Paro and Devdas, childhood sweethearts, separate due to
the blockade Devdas’ father creates between them to get married. Inevitably,
the social set up demands them to get married if they wish to live together as
husband and wife. This poses the problem of having no other way without the
permission of Devdas’ father. The lovers in this movie never get together. This
was Indian society in 1955. Marriages are accepted only if they are performed
according to the tradition of their respective communities, which points
straight at the influence of the family and community....(to be ctd.)
Anu Lal, Author, Lecturer in English, and blogger

3 comments:
well written, waiting for the next. Best of luck. Dhanya
Arranged,Lovely and Loved even after marriage-
Freedom,lovely and married,even after separation-
Its the looking glass that clears,and blurs-either way,the participants are super-
Love just cannot be rationed-
Evolving thoughts,fresh perspective Anu
Lovely
Regards
vijay nair
Great post, Anu. I believe everyone should freely choose who they marry but I strongly agree that parental approval is important.
Arranged marriages hold no appeal for me. It inspired me to write my sixth novel, HUSBAND to RENT.
Such pressure can push young people over the edge to take extreme actions.
Post a Comment